• Home
  • Lawyers
    • Personal Injury
    • Family & Divorce
    • Criminal & DUI
    • Bankruptcy
    • Workers Compensation
    • Business
    • Real Estate
    • Employment
    • Estate Planning
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Immigration
    • Landlord Tenant
    • Social Security Disability
    • Tax
    • Probate
  • Legal Services
  • Local Courts
    • San Bernardino County Courts
    • Riverside County Courts
  • Blog

Inland Empire
Legal Blog

25 Year Veteran Lawyer Discusses Nursing Home Abuse

3/30/2017

Comments

 
Picture

Tackling Elder Abuse in San Bernardino & Riverside Counties

When you entrust a family member to the care of a facility, there’s an expectation of compassion and empathy to be given. Often times family members don’t have the time or resources to properly help care for their loved one full time, and you have to trust that the facility you choose can implement a care plan and take responsibility for your loved one. Many reputable nursing & care facilities seek to hire the best caretakers and have strict operating procedures in place to make sure your family member is getting the best care available and the attention that they need. However, ABC recently reported that nearly 30% of elderly residents at care facilities endure some sort of physical, emotional or financial abuse.
This news prompted us to seek comment from one of the Inland Empire’s premier injury litigators, Cory Weck of McCune Wright Arevalo, LLP in Ontario, who’s recently litigated two elder abuse cases involving care facilities.
Cory Weck discusses elder abuse
InlandEmpireLawyers.com: How long have you worked as a personal injury lawyer?

Mr. Weck: I’ve been a lawyer for over 20 years, but I’ve practiced nothing but personal injury law on behalf of individuals for the past 15 years

InlandEmpireLawyers.com: What are the most common ways cases of caretaker abuse discovered?

Mr. Weck: Usually abuse is discovered when it’s too late and the consequences are irreversible.  Since the family often doesn't live in close proximity to the home where their loved one is located, it’s usually a call from the ER when they first become aware that something bad had occurred.

InlandEmpireLawyers.com: What are the alert signals that family members should look for, or be aware of that would indicate elder abuse?

Mr. Weck: Do you notice a significant change in your loved one’s demeanor?  Do you notice bruising?  Do you notice that they don’t seem to want to eat anymore?  Is there a lot of turnover in the staff? 

InlandEmpireLawyers.com: Are there any reporting agencies or resources people can use to research complaints against a facility or care taker?

Mr. Weck: Yes there are agencies both at the local level and the state level one can report complaints to against the facility like Adult Protective Services in San Bernardino or Riverside Counties.

InlandEmpireLawyers.com: What should someone do if they suspect that a loved one is being abused by someone at a care facility?

Mr. Weck: It really depends on the severity of the abuse.  For more minor type of complaints I would start with the facility management and then work up through the chain of command if your concerns are not addressed. For more serious events immediately file a complaint with your county agency and the state. If serious or deadly harm occurred I would advise seeking local counsel who has experience in these types of claims.

Elder Abuse & Negligence Resources

National Center on Elder Abuse: https://ncea.acl.gov/resources/state.html
National Center for State Courts: http://www.ncsc.org/Topics/Children-Families-and-Elders/Elder-Abuse/Resource-Guide.aspx

Picture
McCune Wright Arevalo, LLP is a litigation firm in Ontario, Ca focusing handling cases involving consumer fraud, personal injury, wrongful death and class actions. Attorney Cory Weck is a lifetime resident of the Inland Empire and heads the personal injury claims division, He is an Ivy League graduate and a Marine Corps officer for over 23 years. He has personally handled hundreds of cases and has recovered millions on behalf of his clients.
Photo Credit: https://pixabay.com/en/users/Unsplash-242387/
Comments

The Use of Experts in Opposition Summary Judgment – Make Sure you Designate!

3/8/2017

Comments

 
Courtroom sign
Whenever a trial date is set, a party may demand simultaneous exchange of expert witness information (Code of Civil Procedure § 2034.210).

If a party fails to comply with the exchange of expert witness information, and the other side objects, “the trial court shall exclude from evidence the expert opinion” of said witness. (Code of Civil Procedure § 2034.300)

The recent case of Perry v. Bakewell Hawthorne, LLC, (2017) Cal. Lexis 1351, raised a novel issue as it relates to the above sections. Perry was a personal injury matter wherein the plaintiff fell on defendant’s property. Defendant moved for summary judgment, which was set to be heard after the exchange of expert witness information.

In his opposition, plaintiff used the declarations of two experts to demonstrate that the stairs he fell on were in disrepair and did not comply with building code and industry standards. The problem was that neither of these two declarants had been identified in the expert witness information exchange.

The issue became whether the exclusionary rule of CCP § 2034.300 applied only to the use of those experts at trial or whether it also applied at the summary judgment stage.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court of California held looked to the Section governing motions for summary judgment – CCP § 437c. They held, Section 437c(d) requires that affidavits and declarations submitted in summary judgment proceedings “set forth admissible evidence.” They held that when the court determines an expert opinion is inadmissible because disclosure requirements were not met, the opinion must be excluded from consideration at summary judgment if an objection is raised.

In this matter, because the declarations attached to the opposition to motion for summary judgment were by two experts whom would be excluded from testifying at trial, their declarations were similarly inadmissible to refute the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Published By: Jean-Simon Serrano


Photo Credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/surreynews/

Picture
Heiting & Irwin are personal injury lawyers in Riverside who work with clients throughout San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. We've recovered over $300M for our clients since 1979 and charge no fees until the successful conclusion of your case.
Comments

    IE Legal Hub

    Local legal information, published by local Inland Empire lawyers.

    Are you a local attorney?
    Post your content here, learn why and then check out the submission rules and guidelines.

    Archives

    April 2022
    September 2021
    March 2021
    December 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015

    Categories

    All
    Attorneys
    Business
    Criminal Defense
    Divorce
    DUI
    Employment Law
    Estate Planning
    Family Law
    General Information
    Lawyers
    Legal Marketing
    Mass Tort Litigation
    Medical Malpractice
    Personal Injury

    RSS Feed


    inlandempirelawyers.com

Home
Non-Attorney Legal Services
San Bernardino Courts
Riverside Courts

Blog

Sitemap
Practice Areas
Personal Injury Attorneys
Family & Divorce Attorneys
Criminal & DUI Defense Attorneys
Bankruptcy Attorneys
Workers' Compensation Attorneys
Business Attorneys
Real Estate Attorneys
Employment Attorneys
Estate Planning Attorneys
Medical Malpractice Attorneys
Immigration Attorneys
Landlord - Tenant Attorneys
Social Security/Disability Attorneys
Tax Attorneys
Probate Attorneys
Inland Empire lawyers
Are you a local attorney? Add a Listing | Why Advertise With Us? | Free Advertising

Proud Member of the Riverside, San Bernardino and Western San Bernardino County Bar Associations.
Riverside County Bar Associaton logo
Western San Bernardino County Bar Association logo
San Bernardino County Bar Association logo
Attorneys in San Bernardino & Riverside counties serving the following communities: Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, Rialto, Colton, Loma Linda, Redlands, Yucaipa, Upland, Ontario, Montclair, Chino, Chino Hills, Corona, Norco, Eastvale, Grand Terrace, Jurupa Valley, Mira Loma, Palm Springs, Moreno Valley, Temecula, Pomona, Claremont, La Verne and all neighboring cities. 

Disclaimer: The information provided on InlandEmpireLawyers.com is general information and is not legal advice, InlandEmpireLawyers.com is not a lawyer referral service and makes no guarantees about law firm claims or the accuracy of information presented. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by use of the site and form submissions made to attorney profiles are not confidential. The attorney listings on InlandEmpireLawyers.com are attorney advertisements and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by InlandEmpireLawyers.com or any approved or authorized lawyer referral service. Your access of/to and use of this site is subject to additional Terms and Conditions. None of the content on this website constitutes a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of any legal matter. Research a law firm thoroughly before hiring.
Copyright © 2021 Everest Legal Marketing All rights reserved.
attorneys in the Inland Empire